Friends Organizations - Revision history

Frederick Swarts at 01:47, 4 September 2011

2011-09-04T01:47:16Z

Frederick Swarts: /* References */

2011-09-04T01:46:38Z

‎References

Frederick Swarts: /* U.S. Friends Organizations */

2011-09-04T01:46:19Z

‎U.S. Friends Organizations

Frederick Swarts at 01:45, 4 September 2011

2011-09-04T01:45:58Z

Frederick Swarts: /* References */

2011-09-04T01:44:53Z

‎References

Frederick Swarts at 01:41, 4 September 2011

2011-09-04T01:41:45Z

Frederick Swarts at 01:24, 4 September 2011

2011-09-04T01:24:43Z

Frederick Swarts: /* Friends Organizations versus Chapters */

2011-09-04T01:23:26Z

‎Friends Organizations versus Chapters

Frederick Swarts at 01:22, 4 September 2011

2011-09-04T01:22:34Z

Frederick Swarts at 01:21, 4 September 2011

2011-09-04T01:21:28Z

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ==U.S. Friends Organizations==
-[[Image:Friends2.gif|right|400px]]
+[[Image:FRiendsOrgs.gif|right|400px]]
 With that distinction in mind, let us first look at the operation of a United States friends organization and the organization it supports. I would like to stress the importance of the rule in this area that, in order to fulfill the responsibilities of stewardship that we talked about, the board of the United States organization, even a friends organization, still has that duty to fulfill its stewardship duties in the United States. That is, it cannot simply pass on that role and responsibility to the organization that it supports abroad.
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 Let me give you an example of how this might be done systematically with a minimum of effort for both parties, and in a way that recognizes that time is not an unlimited resource. Let us assume that there is a U.S. friends group that supports a Kilimanjaro school in Arusha, Tanzania. In this case, money is raised by the friends group to support the school. The proper next step is for the friends board to decide essentially to make a grant to the school for those same purposes. The school then agrees, by way of a simple grant agreement, to distinguish the transfer and distribution of U.S. funds to the foreign organization from simply a pass-through. (This can be done, by the way, in a very simple one or two page formally written letter.)
-[[Image:FRiendsOrgs.gif|right|400px]]
+[[Image:Friends2.gif|right|400px]]
 Through this grant agreement, the school agrees to use the funds for school purposes and importantly agrees to report back to the friends organization. They will write a report describing the expenditures and the accomplishments of the grant. If the friends organization sees that the funds are being used inappropriately, or is not getting a report, or is simply not satisfied for some reasons as it carries out its duty of stewardship, then it has the legal right and responsibility to refuse to make a grant. By doing so, it does fulfill its duty under the law, although that step is very rare.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:46, 4 September 2011
Line 37:		Line 37:

	The foundation for this article are excerpts from a presentation by Jeffrey M. Hurwit, J.D. (Founder, Hurwit & Associates) given on June 8, 2010 at the 2010 online World Congress of NGOs. The presentation was titled "Nonprofit Law: Legal and Governance Issues for NGOs Worldwide."		The foundation for this article are excerpts from a presentation by Jeffrey M. Hurwit, J.D. (Founder, Hurwit & Associates) given on June 8, 2010 at the 2010 online World Congress of NGOs. The presentation was titled "Nonprofit Law: Legal and Governance Issues for NGOs Worldwide."
−	[[Image:JeffreyHurwit.png]]	+	[[Image:JeffreyHurwit.png\|right]]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ==U.S. Friends Organizations==
-[[Image:Friends2.gif|right|140px]]
+[[Image:Friends2.gif|right|400px]]
 With that distinction in mind, let us first look at the operation of a United States friends organization and the organization it supports. I would like to stress the importance of the rule in this area that, in order to fulfill the responsibilities of stewardship that we talked about, the board of the United States organization, even a friends organization, still has that duty to fulfill its stewardship duties in the United States. That is, it cannot simply pass on that role and responsibility to the organization that it supports abroad.
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 Let me give you an example of how this might be done systematically with a minimum of effort for both parties, and in a way that recognizes that time is not an unlimited resource. Let us assume that there is a U.S. friends group that supports a Kilimanjaro school in Arusha, Tanzania. In this case, money is raised by the friends group to support the school. The proper next step is for the friends board to decide essentially to make a grant to the school for those same purposes. The school then agrees, by way of a simple grant agreement, to distinguish the transfer and distribution of U.S. funds to the foreign organization from simply a pass-through. (This can be done, by the way, in a very simple one or two page formally written letter.)
-[[Image:FRiendsOrgs.gif|right|140px]]
+[[Image:FRiendsOrgs.gif|right|400px]]
 Through this grant agreement, the school agrees to use the funds for school purposes and importantly agrees to report back to the friends organization. They will write a report describing the expenditures and the accomplishments of the grant. If the friends organization sees that the funds are being used inappropriately, or is not getting a report, or is simply not satisfied for some reasons as it carries out its duty of stewardship, then it has the legal right and responsibility to refuse to make a grant. By doing so, it does fulfill its duty under the law, although that step is very rare.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ==U.S. Friends Organizations==
 With that distinction in mind, let us first look at the operation of a United States friends organization and the organization it supports. I would like to stress the importance of the rule in this area that, in order to fulfill the responsibilities of stewardship that we talked about, the board of the United States organization, even a friends organization, still has that duty to fulfill its stewardship duties in the United States. That is, it cannot simply pass on that role and responsibility to the organization that it supports abroad.
@@ Line 23: / Line 24: @@
 Let me give you an example of how this might be done systematically with a minimum of effort for both parties, and in a way that recognizes that time is not an unlimited resource. Let us assume that there is a U.S. friends group that supports a Kilimanjaro school in Arusha, Tanzania. In this case, money is raised by the friends group to support the school. The proper next step is for the friends board to decide essentially to make a grant to the school for those same purposes. The school then agrees, by way of a simple grant agreement, to distinguish the transfer and distribution of U.S. funds to the foreign organization from simply a pass-through. (This can be done, by the way, in a very simple one or two page formally written letter.)
 Through this grant agreement, the school agrees to use the funds for school purposes and importantly agrees to report back to the friends organization. They will write a report describing the expenditures and the accomplishments of the grant. If the friends organization sees that the funds are being used inappropriately, or is not getting a report, or is simply not satisfied for some reasons as it carries out its duty of stewardship, then it has the legal right and responsibility to refuse to make a grant. By doing so, it does fulfill its duty under the law, although that step is very rare.
@@ Line 35: / Line 37: @@
 The foundation for this article are excerpts from a presentation by Jeffrey M. Hurwit, J.D. (Founder, Hurwit & Associates) given on June 8, 2010 at the 2010 online World Congress of NGOs. The presentation was titled "Nonprofit Law: Legal and Governance Issues for NGOs Worldwide."
 [[Image:JeffreyHurwit.png]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 4 September 2011
Line 35:		Line 35:

	The foundation for this article are excerpts from a presentation by Jeffrey M. Hurwit, J.D. (Founder, Hurwit & Associates) given on June 8, 2010 at the 2010 online World Congress of NGOs. The presentation was titled "Nonprofit Law: Legal and Governance Issues for NGOs Worldwide."		The foundation for this article are excerpts from a presentation by Jeffrey M. Hurwit, J.D. (Founder, Hurwit & Associates) given on June 8, 2010 at the 2010 online World Congress of NGOs. The presentation was titled "Nonprofit Law: Legal and Governance Issues for NGOs Worldwide."
		+
		+	[[Image:JeffreyHurwit.png]]
		+	[[Image:Friends2.gif]]
		+	[[Image:FRiendsOrgs.gif]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 4 September 2011
Line 34:		Line 34:
	==References==		==References==

−	The foundation for this article are excerpts from a presentation by ~~Jeffery~~ M. Hurwit, J.D. (Founder, Hurwit & Associates) given on June 8, 2010 at the 2010 online World Congress of NGOs. The presentation was titled "Nonprofit Law: Legal and Governance Issues for NGOs Worldwide."	+	The foundation for this article are excerpts from a presentation by Jeffrey M. Hurwit, J.D. (Founder, Hurwit & Associates) given on June 8, 2010 at the 2010 online World Congress of NGOs. The presentation was titled "Nonprofit Law: Legal and Governance Issues for NGOs Worldwide."

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ==Friends Organizations versus Chapters==
 ===Friends organization===
-One is the concept of a “friends organization,” sometimes called a supporting organization. (It also is often called a “friends of organization,” since so many nonprofits that support foreign charities have names that begin with those two terms, such as Friends of China Heritage Fund. However, there also are innumerable such nonprofits that do not have names that begin with those two words, such as <membersonly>Doctors Without Border/Medecins Sans Frontieres.) In the United States, the term friends organization has a technical legal meaning, which I am not referring to now. When I use the informal term “friends organization,” I mean an organization in one countrymdash;say the United States:mdash;that has organized funds for the purpose of supporting an organization in another country. This is commonly, for example, friends of a university or a museum abroad. So here I am talking primarily in terms of when funds flow from the United States to an organization supported abroad.
+One is the concept of a “friends organization,” sometimes called a supporting organization. (It also is often called a “friends of organization,” since so many nonprofits that support foreign charities have names that begin with those two terms, such as Friends of China Heritage Fund. However, there also are innumerable such nonprofits that do not have names that begin with those two words, such as <membersonly>Doctors Without Border/Medecins Sans Frontieres.) In the United States, the term friends organization has a technical legal meaning, which I am not referring to now. When I use the informal term “friends organization,” I mean an organization in one country -- say the United States -- that has organized funds for the purpose of supporting an organization in another country. This is commonly, for example, friends of a university or a museum abroad. So here I am talking primarily in terms of when funds flow from the United States to an organization supported abroad.
 ===Chapter===
@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 Through this grant agreement, the school agrees to use the funds for school purposes and importantly agrees to report back to the friends organization. They will write a report describing the expenditures and the accomplishments of the grant. If the friends organization sees that the funds are being used inappropriately, or is not getting a report, or is simply not satisfied for some reasons as it carries out its duty of stewardship, then it has the legal right and responsibility to refuse to make a grant. By doing so, it does fulfill its duty under the law, although that step is very rare.
-Typically, this understanding of stewardship is recognized by both sides; it is not just the U.S. understanding its duties in stewardship. With this understanding in mind, the friends group and the entity in the other country&mdash;the school in the example&mdash;would develop a sound working relationship in a simple operating agreement. The agreement lays out in very straightforward, non-legalistic terms how this relationship is going to work: how there is the expectation that there will be a transfer of funds and a report on a regular basis. This will lead to a good relationship where there is an exchange of information and financials and hopefully an ability to work together in planning for major capital expenditures, school improvements, school needs. This can all be done while still observing that the organizations are legally separate and have different legal responsibilities.
+Typically, this understanding of stewardship is recognized by both sides; it is not just the U.S. understanding its duties in stewardship. With this understanding in mind, the friends group and the entity in the other country -- the school in the example -- would develop a sound working relationship in a simple operating agreement. The agreement lays out in very straightforward, non-legalistic terms how this relationship is going to work: how there is the expectation that there will be a transfer of funds and a report on a regular basis. This will lead to a good relationship where there is an exchange of information and financials and hopefully an ability to work together in planning for major capital expenditures, school improvements, school needs. This can all be done while still observing that the organizations are legally separate and have different legal responsibilities.
 ==Summary==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Taking into account the legal duties of United States nonprofit boards, let us take examine how this impacts the relationship between United States organizations and NGOs outside the United States.
-Since I know that the laws and terminology of nonprofit cultures can vary so widely between countries, let us first make sure at the onset that we are all using in the same way two terms that are often confused.
+Since the laws and terminology of nonprofit cultures can vary so widely between countries, let us first make sure at the onset that we are all using in the same way two terms that are often confused.
 ==Friends Organizations versus Chapters==
 ===Friends organization===
-One is the concept of a “friends organization,” sometimes called a supporting organization. (It also is often called a “friends of organization,” since so many nonprofits that support foreign charities have names that begin with those two terms, such as Friends of China Heritage Fund. However, there also are innumerable such nonprofits that do not have names that begin with those two words, such as {{members only}}Doctors Without Border/Medecins Sans Frontieres.) In the United States, the term friends organization has a technical legal meaning, which I am not referring to now. When I use the informal term “friends organization,” I mean an organization in one country  say the United States  that has organized funds for the purpose of supporting an organization in another country. This is commonly, for example, friends of a university or a museum abroad. So here I am talking primarily in terms of when funds flow from the United States to an organization supported abroad.
+One is the concept of a “friends organization,” sometimes called a supporting organization. (It also is often called a “friends of organization,” since so many nonprofits that support foreign charities have names that begin with those two terms, such as Friends of China Heritage Fund. However, there also are innumerable such nonprofits that do not have names that begin with those two words, such as <membersonly>Doctors Without Border/Medecins Sans Frontieres.) In the United States, the term friends organization has a technical legal meaning, which I am not referring to now. When I use the informal term “friends organization,” I mean an organization in one country  say the United States  that has organized funds for the purpose of supporting an organization in another country. This is commonly, for example, friends of a university or a museum abroad. So here I am talking primarily in terms of when funds flow from the United States to an organization supported abroad.
 ===Chapter===