Difference between revisions of "Humanitarian NGO Sector"
From NGO Handbook
(→Differences Among Humanitarian NGOs) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Humanitarian [[ | + | Humanitarian [[Overview of NGOs|non-governmental organizations (NGOs)]] are an integral component of international affairs and security, and integral to the functioning of the United Nations and the world at large. Some of the best known NGOs focus on humanitarian issues, such as the International Red Cross, Salvation Army, CARE International, and Oxfam. |
Humanitarian NGOs are mainly concerned with the life and welfare of displaced persons and with the delivery of social services including food delivery, health and mental care, nutrition, and education and training. <membersonly> | Humanitarian NGOs are mainly concerned with the life and welfare of displaced persons and with the delivery of social services including food delivery, health and mental care, nutrition, and education and training. <membersonly> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Although the objectives of NGOs are generally the same, there is a difference among Humanitarian NGOs in the [[US Nonprofit Sector, Tax Benefits, WANGO Survey|United States]] and Europe. European NGOs place more importance on the longer-term perspective on development, maintaining independent from their government, garnering their funds privately instead of relying on public (government) funding, and are not keen to cooperating with their own government’s military. In contrast, NGOs based in the United States have a more practical, short-term approach to development, focused on meeting immediate needs, a closer relationship to government, greater reliance on public (government) funding, and greater acceptance of cooperation with the military. There are movements towards greater coordination between international development NGOs, and there is common ground to be found between NGOs that exist around the world. | Although the objectives of NGOs are generally the same, there is a difference among Humanitarian NGOs in the [[US Nonprofit Sector, Tax Benefits, WANGO Survey|United States]] and Europe. European NGOs place more importance on the longer-term perspective on development, maintaining independent from their government, garnering their funds privately instead of relying on public (government) funding, and are not keen to cooperating with their own government’s military. In contrast, NGOs based in the United States have a more practical, short-term approach to development, focused on meeting immediate needs, a closer relationship to government, greater reliance on public (government) funding, and greater acceptance of cooperation with the military. There are movements towards greater coordination between international development NGOs, and there is common ground to be found between NGOs that exist around the world. | ||
| − | Some NGOs engage in more direct relief work versus long-term rehabilitation and reconstruction. An example of this is the post-tsunami efforts. After the disaster occurred, many NGOs provided immediate relief but few stayed several months after the crisis. Action Against Hunger, based in both the UK and Spain was one of the humanitarian NGOs that responded to the devastation of the tsunamis, having teams of people building latrines, trucking in water, and recovering bodies in Sri Lanka. ActionAid USA distributed medical supplies, food items and shelter material, as well as providing psychosocial support and helping restore livelihoods in [[India]]. Although these organizations were helpful in their attempts to provide aid and relief, their stay was short-term. In contrast to other organizations World Relief USA | + | Some NGOs engage in more direct relief work versus long-term rehabilitation and reconstruction. An example of this is the post-tsunami efforts. After the disaster occurred, many NGOs provided immediate relief but few stayed several months after the crisis. Action Against Hunger, based in both the UK and Spain was one of the humanitarian NGOs that responded to the devastation of the tsunamis, having teams of people building latrines, trucking in water, and recovering bodies in Sri Lanka. ActionAid USA distributed medical supplies, food items and shelter material, as well as providing psychosocial support and helping restore livelihoods in [[India NGO Sector|India]]. Although these organizations were helpful in their attempts to provide aid and relief, their stay was short-term. In contrast to other organizations, World Relief USA had a long term vision, preparing a long-term plan for rehabilitation and reconstruction work. World Vision International is another organization that has a long-term plan, working on the development of settlements, repairing damaged houses and schools in Sri Lanka and India. In Thailand, World Vision International is planning to set up two training and service centers for counseling while it continues to build shelters. |
==Humanitarian NGOs and Terrorism== | ==Humanitarian NGOs and Terrorism== | ||
| − | A challenge that NGOs face is the ongoing global campaign against terrorism. Humanitarian NGOs have | + | A challenge that NGOs face is the ongoing global campaign against terrorism. Humanitarian NGOs have had difficulty adopting an approach to terrorism. They want to denounce the campaign against terrorism and its dire consequences, while getting ready to work in the countries in conflict. |
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) demands that humanitarian organizations adhere to their political principles against terrorism. The anti-terrorist campaign affects humanitarian NGOs because it decides which countries should receive humanitarian aid. Politics plays an integral role regarding the decisions humanitarian NGOs have to make. There are countries that are allies and foes of the United States, making it difficult for NGOs to have the opportunity to assist all people who are in need of assistance. | The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) demands that humanitarian organizations adhere to their political principles against terrorism. The anti-terrorist campaign affects humanitarian NGOs because it decides which countries should receive humanitarian aid. Politics plays an integral role regarding the decisions humanitarian NGOs have to make. There are countries that are allies and foes of the United States, making it difficult for NGOs to have the opportunity to assist all people who are in need of assistance. | ||
| − | ===Examples of How Terrorism/Violence Affects Humanitarian NGOs=== | + | ===Examples of How Terrorism/Violence Affects Humanitarian NGOs=== |
| + | Humanitarian NGOs are an integral component during social disasters, such as war. While these NGOs try to bring good to certain countries, they are also targeted. For example, the Red Cross was deliberately targeted in a bomb attack in Baghdad in 2003. That bomb attack prompted many aid agencies operating in Iraq to re-evaluate their presence. Five humanitarian NGOs in particular were affected by this event while providing humanitarian assistance in Iraq at the same time. Doctors Without Borders, Oxfam, Save the Children, Care International, and the World Food Program are all humanitarian NGOs that sent teams and volunteers to Iraq. However, they were also put at risk while operating there. | ||
| − | Doctors Without Borders has been working to provide medical assistance to hospitals in Iraq. The war disrupted the distribution of basic medical supplies, while many hospitals lost key equipment in the looting that took place after the war. Following the bomb attacks, DWB reduced its team of seven who worked in Baghdad. Those taken off their assignment were sent to Jordan and waited until it was safe to return. | + | Doctors Without Borders has been working to provide medical assistance to hospitals in Iraq. The war disrupted the distribution of basic medical supplies, while many hospitals lost key equipment in the looting that took place after the war. Following the bomb attacks, DWB reduced its team of seven who worked in Baghdad. Those taken off their assignment were sent to Jordan and waited there until it was safe to return. |
| − | Oxfam, a British-based aid agency, has primarily been involved with water and sanitation projects. There have been problems with accessing clean water and | + | Oxfam, a British-based aid agency, has primarily been involved with water and sanitation projects. There have been problems with accessing clean water and electricity, both impacting the sewage treatment. After the attack on the United Nations Baghdad headquarters in August, Oxfam pulled its entire foreign staff out of the country and they now rely on a core team of 50 nationals. |
| − | Save The Children has primarily been involved | + | Save The Children has primarily been involved in assisting Iraqi health and education services. One hundred staff continue to work in the country, including expatriates and Iraqi nationals. Following the attack on the UN, the agency suspended all operations in Baghdad. In order to ensure their safey, their staff had to be scaled down, impacting the efficiency of their work. |
Care International is helping to repair waste and sanitation facilities, as well as assisting with health education. It is one of the few agencies to have increased its presence despite the bomb attack. While other workers have been pulled out of Baghdad, Care International has moved its staff into the capital. | Care International is helping to repair waste and sanitation facilities, as well as assisting with health education. It is one of the few agencies to have increased its presence despite the bomb attack. While other workers have been pulled out of Baghdad, Care International has moved its staff into the capital. | ||
| − | World Food Programme , | + | World Food Programme , a United Nations agency, provides 60% of the Iraqi population (about 16 million people) with food parcels of wheat, flour, sugar, rice, milk powder, tea, detergent, pulses and cooking oil. |
| + | |||
| + | It is challenging for humanitarian NGOs to provide aid and relief efforts when they themselves are also at risk. Iraq is just one conflict zone that has put relief workers at risk the past few years. The current conflict in Darfur is preventing aid and humanitarian NGOs from going there and providing assistance because of the dangers it poses to their relief workers. A recent article from BBC News stated that nearly half a million people in the Darfur region of Sudan have less access to aid because of the increase in violence. Because of this violence, there has been a temporary withdrawal of workers that serve a total of 488,000 people. Those that withdrew humanitarian workers include Oxfam, the International Rescue Committee, Goal, Concern, World Vision, and the Norwegian Refugee Council. They said that violence against humanitarian workers have increased throughout Darfur since the beginning of December. “If the deterioration is allowed to continue, the impact on civilians could be devastating,” says Paul Smith-Lomas, Regional Director for Oxfam. “With new displacements and attacks, the presence of aid agencies is more important than ever. Yet every day brings one huge blow after another to aid efforts,” he adds. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Because of the violence and increased conflict in these areas, humanitarian NGOs cannot provide aid, shelter, or food to the people. The violence and terrorism that occur affects the local populations not only because it puts their lives in danger and deteriorates their quality of life, but it prevents them from receiving aid from humanitarian NGOs. As much as the aid workers want to help the victims, when their own lives are put at risk, they have to withdraw until the situation is deemed safe to return. | ||
| − | |||
==Controversy with Humanitarian NGOs== | ==Controversy with Humanitarian NGOs== | ||
| − | + | Recently, non-governmental organizations have come under scrutiny due to issues surrounding the accountability of NGOs. The importance of humanitarian NGOs has increased since World War II and with this increased influence comes more responsibility. NGOs understand they have to live up to certain standards of accountability since it is imperative for them to have public support. If there are allegations of corruption or misuse of funds, it is detrimental not only to the NGO itself, but to all NGOs because they depend on one another to uphold the reputation of NGOs as a whole. | |
| − | Recently, non-governmental organizations have come under scrutiny due to issues surrounding the accountability of NGOs. The importance of humanitarian NGOs has increased since World War II and with this increased influence comes more responsibility. NGOs understand they have to live up to certain standards of accountability | ||
| − | The influence of NGOs has increased in many ways | + | The influence of NGOs has increased in many ways including NGO officials often being cited in the media and corporations consulting with NGOs prior to major investments. The NGO role has expanded and for the most part has been unchecked and unregulated. There have been increasing calls for greater transparency in NGO operations and for the public to become more aware. It is important to understand who funds NGOs, how effective their programs are, what their agendas are, and to whom they are accountable. A few organizations have tackled the issue of accountability within NGOs, including NGO Watch, One World Trust, and Sustainability. Their main objectives are to monitor financial resources, expose bias and report conflicts of interest. . |
| + | |||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
| − | Since World War II, humanitarian NGOs have played an important role | + | Since World War II, humanitarian NGOs have played an important role in a world that faces many natural and social disasters. With the significant contribution of humanitarian NGOs, the world is a more protected and cared for place. Although humanitarian NGOs face many challenges including political corruption and terrorism, they must persevere in order to continue to provide aid and relief throughout the world. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Humanitarian NGOs have been instrumental in alleviating the effects of wars and disasters for the past two centuries. With their growing influence and significance in the world, they have become a ray of hope for displaced people around the world who rely on their aid and support. | |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 12:19, 6 August 2008
Humanitarian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are an integral component of international affairs and security, and integral to the functioning of the United Nations and the world at large. Some of the best known NGOs focus on humanitarian issues, such as the International Red Cross, Salvation Army, CARE International, and Oxfam.
Humanitarian NGOs are mainly concerned with the life and welfare of displaced persons and with the delivery of social services including food delivery, health and mental care, nutrition, and education and training.
To read the rest of the article, please log in using your WANGO membership username and password (using the log in at the top, right-hand corner of the page). Not a WANGO member, but would like full access to the articles in the NGO Handbook? Join WANGO (http://www.wango.org/join.aspx) as an organization or individual member or purchase a year subscription for $30.
